Letter to the League of Women Voters

Voters used to care if candidates received equal billing at election time, but those days seem long passed.  We the people have fallen into a disastrous pattern of a two party system, where even the people who clamor on about wanting equality fail to demand equality. In fact, they even defend inequality and have loaded voters with an arsenal of excuses on why they must vote for one of the two parties.

“The other candidates aren’t polling well.” “I dont really like either one, but unfortunately they are the only options I have been given to choose from. “She believes this, and he believes that. I dont really like either one, but unfortunately they are the only options I have been given to choose from. I must pick one.

In most elections it ends up the equivalent of picking a vacation in the Bog of Eternal Stench or the Fire Swamp. 

The problem we have in this country is that many of the groups out there working to inform the citizens of their options in the political process have become so inundated with the duopoly of the system they have forgotten the true nature of their purpose; to inform voters of their options. There are options out there other than the Republicans and the Democrats. The average voter, though, doesnt know about these options because they are not being informed by the people they have been instructed to trust with this information.

When a group, such as the League of Women Voters, puts out a voters guide and it fails to provide information on all qualified candidates in the race it just proves they have fallen victim to the duopoly in this country they say they are striving to rise above. When the country is faced with a future oligarchy, taking the choice out of the voters’ hands and placing it in the hands of a select few who make deals in back rooms while holding back the citizens who lay wanting for freedoms, one would think equality between the candidates would be at the forefront of the activists groups who strive for equality. 

Groups such as these use phrases such as nonpartisan, which is a blatant lie, because they show themselves to be partisan in many different fashions. Yes, they have worked hard to find equality for their core demographic, but shouldnt the end goal be equality for all those in America? Doesnt their blatant disregard for any political party that doesnt begin with an R” or a D” show their intrinsic bias toward any candidate who may stand for a more universal equality than the options they allow their followers to learn about? 

 If these groups actually stood for, and believed in, equality they wouldnt disregard candidates who were qualified and give childish excuses for their actions. They would place these names on the ballots next to the candidates they have been programmed to support in order to educate the country on their true options on election day.

Leave a Reply